During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
06:23, 28 февраля 2026Бывший СССР。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
这一阵子，只要单位不加班，周五下了班，小苏就从石家庄主城区赶回家帮父母做灯笼。妈妈说：“人家都忙着搞对象，你不要跑了。”她不听，她是心疼父母，“年底忙，我帮他们干点儿，爸爸妈妈太辛苦了。”
让所有人在十年后，仍然需要 iPhone，这一点在搜狗输入法下载中也有详细论述
居民委员会应当及时公布下列事项，接受居民的监督：